Excerpts from the
Annual State Revenue Report for 1997

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A. 1998 Revenue Forecast and Estimate of Tax Benefits
B. Tax Revenues of the Public Sector
C. Corporate Income Tax
D. Taxation of Real Estate
E. Value Added Tax and Purchase Taxes
F. Motor Vehicle and Fuel Taxes
G. Liberalization of Imports from Third Countries
H. Fees
I. International Comparison of Tax Burdens


A. 1998 Revenue Forecast and Estimate of Tax Benefits

1. According to the forecast for 1998, state tax revenues will be NIS114.8 billion (in current prices), 1.6 percent higher than in 1997 in real terms. This increase will occur if Gross Domestic Product expands by 1.5 percent as predicted, because of legislative changes and despite a decrease in personal income tax prompted by a tax-bracket adjustment exceeding the inflation rate. In terms of proportion of GDP, tax collections are expected to remain at the 1997 level of 32.1 percent.
2. Legislative changes will augment collections in 1998 by NIS250 million, after an increase of 0.7 percent of GDP in 1997 relative to 1996. Legislative changes in 1993-1996, in contrast, reduced tax receipts by a cumulative 2.1 percent of GDP.
3. Tax benefits in 1988 will be NIS19.2 billion or 16 percent of state tax revenuesa higher proportion than in 1997. Any additional tax benefit and any expansion of existing benefits will have the effect of transferring this portion of the tax burden to the rest of the population, not to mention further entangling the tax laws.

B. Tax Revenues of the Public Sector

1. Total taxes collected by the public sectorcentral government plus the National Insurance Institute and municipal and other authoritieswere NIS137.8 billion in 1997 or 40.8 percent of GDP. This result, a 1.4 percentage-point increase relative to 1996, is traceable to legislative changes and a decrease in income-tax refunds.
2. The economic downturn in 1997 left its mark on state tax revenues. Not only did GDP increase by only 1.9 percent this year, but the components of the growth tilted toward uses typified by low tax intensivity. Thus, the increase in exports contributed to economic growth in 1997 but had no perceptible effect on tax receipts, while imports of tax-intensive products such as motor vehicles and other durables decreased substantially in real terms.
3. The direct-tax burden climbed to 21.2 percent of GDP1.6 percentage point higher than in 1996and the indirect-tax burden slipped by 0.1 percent to 19.6 percent of GDP.

C. Corporate Income Tax

1. After a cumulative decrease of 14 percent in collections of corporate income tax in 1995-1996, a real increase of 20 percent occurred in 1997, bringing total revenue on this account to NIS12.5 billion. Changes in corporate income tax collections do not correspond well to changes in the pace of economic activity because (1)much time passes between taxable economic activity and the payment of taxes on it, and (2)corporations pay tax on capital gains, which are not included in GDP.
2. Processing of 1995 tax returns shows that the collective taxable income of the corporate sector increased by 80 percent in real terms between 1990 and 1995. The number of companies that filed income-tax returns nearly doubled during this time and came to 64,000 in 1995.
3. The proportion of companies that declared a profit climbed from 38 percent in 1990 to 41 percent in 1995.
4. Companies that showed a profit had an average taxable income of NIS860,000 in 1995five percent lower in real terms than in 1990.
5. Among companies that filed returns, the uppermost decile accounted for 93 percent of total profits and tax. The uppermost centile contributed 65 percent of profits and taxa rate that has been declining in the past few years.

D. Taxation of Real Estate

1. Real-estate taxes generated NIS3.2 billion in revenue in 1997.
2. The general economic downturn and, especially, the slump in real estate activity sharply depressed collections in the three real estate taxes: land-betterment tax, real estate purchase tax, and property tax.
3. Revenue from real estate purchase tax, which applies to dwellings, fell by a precipitous 30 percent in real terms relative to the 1996 level, due to an 18 percent decline in the number of transactions.

E. Value Added Tax and Purchase Taxes

1. In 1997, Value Added Tax receipts on account of private and public consumption were NIS31 billion, 1.7 percent higher than the 1996 level in real terms. This modest rate of increase corresponds to the pace of expansion of economic activity in 1997.
2. Value Added Tax receipts (excluding VAT revenue from nonprofit organizations and financial institutions) were 29 percent of total state tax revenues.
3. Revenues from purchase tax on domestic manufacture and imports were NIS7.9 billion in 1997, down 5.5 percent in real terms from the 1996 level. This real decrease is traceable to the aforementioned decline in domestic economic activity and a real decrease in imports of goods.
4. The policy with respect to purchase taxes aims to simplify the tax system, streamline the collection process, and create a substitution effect between purchase taxes and Value Added Tax. Consequently, purchase-tax rates on various inputs have been reduced, lowered, and unified. Budget difficulties make it hard to continue reducing the purchase-tax rates, although adjustments and changes have been occurring.

F. Motor Vehicle and Fuel Taxes

1. Total collection of motor-vehicle taxes (excluding fuel excise) were NIS7.6 billion in 1997, 8 percent lower than in 1996. The economic slowdown was evident in this respect, as in receipts on account of most taxes. Additional factors have created a real downtrend in revenues from motor-vehicle taxes in the past several yearschanges in exchange rates and tax rates, and competition in the motor-vehicle industrydespite the increase in motor-vehicle thefts.
2. The decrease in motor-vehicle tax receipts in 1997 is traceable to a decline in vehicle imports, a real decrease in the prices of vehicles (relative to the Consumer Price Index), a downturn in world prices, and rising competition in the domestic motor-vehicle industry.
3. Revenues from purchase tax and customs on automotive spare parts were NIS260 million in 1997, 10 percent lower in real terms than in 1996. The upturn in thefts of motor vehicles, which after dismantling provide a cheap (and tax-free) alternative to illegal parts, helps explain the decrease in receipts on this account. A decline in the prices of legal parts also contributed to the decrease.
4. Over the past few years, some tax regulations pertaining to recognition and deductibility of businesses car expenses have been amended to correct distortions that had caused businesses to prefer certain vehicles for tax reasons.
5. Several changes with respect to automotive safety accessories were made in the past year. A decision to introduce a uniform exemption for such accessories, obviating the need to declare their price, was made. The purpose of this measure is to prevent artificial inflation of accessory prices in order to benefit from the tax exemption.
6. When engine displacement ceased to be an index for the valuation of motor vehicles, it also stopped being a reasonable basis for taxation. The reform in license fees for private and commercial vehicles created a new basis for tax computations by relying on the prices of new vehicles.
7. State revenues from fuel excise grew by 9 percent in real terms relative to 1996 and came to NIS5 billion. The vigorous growth of receipts on this account is traceable to higher consumer prices for gasoline; the quantity consumed was unchanged as a result of the economic downturn.

G. Liberalization of Imports from Third Countries

1. A program to remove nontariff barriers against imports from third countries (those with which Israel does not have FTA agreements) was introduced in September 1991. The nontariff barriers were replaced with tariffs that were reduced each year following a predetermined schedule. For most industriessuch as structural iron and steel, glass products, tires, and refrigeratorsthe process was completed in 1996. For sensitive industries such as lumber and footwear, 1998 will be the last year. For textiles, the process will end in 2000. By then, tariffs on imports from third countries will have settled at 12 percent on finished products and 8 percent on raw materials.

2. The beginning of the import liberalization marked its sixth anniversary in August 1997; The process of exposing most domestic industries to competing imports was completed at the end of that month.

3. During the six years of the program, the relative prices of all the exposed products decreased by 4 percent on average. The proportion of imports from third countries was higher in the last year of the process than in any year since the program began. Of course, these two findings can be explained in many ways other than the liberalization process itself.


H. Fees

1. State revenues from fees were NIS2.7 billion in 1997. More than 2,000 different fees were in effect, most charged by Ministry of Transport (73 percent) and the Ministry of Justice (13 percent).
2. In 1997, the motor-vehicle licensing fees were revised in several ways as part of the reform in this field.
3. Fees for frequencies were revised, as part of a reform that began in 1995, in order to make the use of the frequency spectrum more efficient.

I. International Comparison of Tax Burdens

1. International comparisons in tax affairs are not simple because different countries tax systems vary widely. Health taxes and compulsory contributions to pension funds are only two examples of differences among countries that would significantly affect data on the tax burden of each.
2. As a percent of GDP, Israels tax burden is lower than the Western European average40 percent as against 50 percentand higher than the 38 percent average in the OECD countries.

3. Israel has a lower direct-tax burden than other countries. Its direct-tax system is noted for a very narrow basethe result of the many exemptions and a rather high thresholdand marginal rates that climb steeply, the uppermost brackets applying to a relatively low level of income.
4. The indirect-tax burden, in contrast, is higher in Israel than in most industrialized countries. Israels Value Added Tax rate is not low by international standards, but its base is very broad. Additionally, especially high purchase taxes are applied to real estate.


Government Logo
Copyright (c) 1998/1999, The State of Israel. All Rights Reserved. (Terms of Use)
Information and proposals, contact webmaster@mof.gov.il
This page last updated on 26-11-98